Originally designed to analyze Beyoncé’s mid-career artistic evolution and its connections to Black intellectual traditions, the course was poised to be a groundbreaking addition to Yale’s curriculum. However, the uproar over whether Beyoncé’s music warranted a place in the Ivy League classroom ultimately led to the class being canceled. Critics labeled it “academic fluff,” while supporters called the cancellation a missed opportunity to explore contemporary cultural history.

The Beyoncé course, set to debut next semester, was to be taught by Professor Daphne Brooks, a distinguished scholar of African American studies and music. Brooks envisioned the class as a deep dive into Beyoncé’s artistry from 2013’s Beyoncé album to her 2024 release, Cowboy Carter. The course aimed to explore her groundbreaking work through the lens of Black feminist theory, performance studies, and political activism.

But almost immediately after the course was announced, it faced fierce backlash. Critics questioned whether Beyoncé, a pop star, deserved to be the subject of Ivy League scrutiny. Memes mocking Yale’s decision flooded social media, with captions like, “Yale: Where $80K a year teaches you how to analyze ‘Single Ladies.’”

The backlash was not limited to Twitter trolls. Several Yale alumni and high-profile donors voiced their concerns, accusing the university of “lowering its academic standards” and pandering to pop culture trends. “This is Yale, not TMZ,” said one alumnus in an op-ed published in a major newspaper. “We should be studying Beethoven and Baldwin, not Beyoncé.”

Faced with mounting criticism, Yale quietly announced that the course would not be offered as planned. In a brief statement, the university said: “While we recognize the cultural significance of Beyoncé’s work, we have decided to reevaluate the course’s alignment with Yale’s academic mission.”

Insiders suggest the decision was heavily influenced by pressure from donors, some of whom reportedly threatened to pull funding if the course went forward. “It’s always about the money,” said one faculty member who wished to remain anonymous. “Yale may claim this was an academic decision, but it was really about appeasing the old guard.”

The cancellation has left many Yale students feeling frustrated and disillusioned. “This wasn’t just a class about Beyoncé,” said junior Mia Thompson. “It was a chance to explore the intersection of music, race, and activism in a way that traditional courses never do. Canceling it feels like erasing those conversations before they even start.”

Protests erupted on campus shortly after the announcement, with students holding signs that read, “If Mozart Gets a Class, So Should Beyoncé” and “Our Tuition Deserves Innovation.” A petition to reinstate the course garnered thousands of signatures within hours.

Others expressed disappointment online. “This is what happens when academia clings to outdated notions of ‘serious’ study,” one student tweeted. “Beyoncé has done more to shape modern culture than half the syllabus at Yale.”

The Beyoncé course has exposed deep divisions within Yale’s faculty. Supporters of the course argue that Beyoncé’s work, much like that of James Baldwin or Nina Simone, deserves rigorous scholarly attention. “Beyoncé isn’t just a pop star,” said one faculty member in the African American Studies department. “She’s an artist who has redefined music, performance, and activism for a generation.”

But not everyone agrees. Critics within the university contend that the course strayed too far into the realm of pop culture. “There’s a fine line between studying culture and glorifying it,” said one professor. “Are we here to educate students or to keep up with Billboard trends?”

Beyoncé’s fiercely loyal fanbase, the Beyhive, wasted no time voicing their outrage over the decision. Social media was flooded with messages of support for the canceled course, with hashtags like #BeyonceDeservesBetter and #LetHerBeHistory trending worldwide.

“Yale just told the world that Black women’s contributions to culture aren’t worthy of study,” one fan tweeted. “But don’t worry, they’ll keep teaching Homer, a guy who hasn’t had a hit in over 2,000 years.”

Others called out the hypocrisy of rejecting a course on Beyoncé while celebrating other cultural figures. “Dylan gets a Nobel Prize, but Beyoncé can’t get a Yale class?” another fan posted. “Make it make sense.”

The controversy surrounding the Beyoncé course raises broader questions about the role of contemporary culture in higher education. Should universities embrace modern cultural icons as legitimate subjects of study, or does doing so risk diluting academic rigor?

“For centuries, academia has resisted the inclusion of voices and perspectives it deems ‘unworthy,’” said Dr. Angela Reid, a cultural historian. “But dismissing Beyoncé as just another pop star ignores the profound impact her work has had on music, race, and gender politics.”

Others, however, remain skeptical. “If we start offering courses on every trending artist, where does it end?” asked one critic. “What’s next? A graduate seminar on the Kardashians?”

Despite Yale’s decision to cancel the course, Professor Brooks remains hopeful that Beyoncé’s work will find a home in academia. “This was never just about one class,” she said. “It’s about recognizing the power of art to reflect and shape the world we live in. Beyoncé’s contributions to culture aren’t going away, and neither is the conversation about them.”

Brooks hinted that she might explore offering a similar course at another institution or through independent workshops. “If Yale isn’t ready for this discussion, I’m sure there are other places that are.”

As the dust settles, the cancellation of the Beyoncé course has left a lasting impression on both its supporters and detractors. For some, it represents a missed opportunity to bring fresh perspectives into the classroom. For others, it’s a reminder that even the most progressive institutions have limits.

One thing is certain: Beyoncé may not have a class at Yale, but her cultural impact has already earned her a place in the history books. And for her fans, that’s more than enough reason to keep fighting for her recognition.

NOTE: This is SATIRE, It’s Not True.